Sale!

Assessment of Radiation Risk to Patient and Staff During Hysterosalpingography (Hsg) Using Conventional X-ray in Katsina State, Nigeria

3,000.00

If you are interested in getting this project material Assessment of Radiation Risk to Patient and Staff During Hysterosalpingography (Hsg) Using Conventional X-ray in Katsina State, Nigeria, click on the DOWNLOAD BUTTON to make payment and the file will be delivered to your email immediately after confirmation.

Description

– Assessment of Radiation Risk to Patient and Staff During Hysterosalpingography (Hsg) Using Conventional X-ray in Katsina State, Nigeria –

Download Assessment of Radiation Risk to Patient and Staff During Hysterosalpingography (Hsg) Using Conventional X-ray in Katsina State, Nigeria. Students who are writing their projects can get this material to aid their research work.

Abstract

Scientific evidence has revealed radiation as one of the causes of cancer and the use of radiation in medicine is on a continuous increase; studies have revealed that the medical use of x-ray is the major contributor of man-made source of radiation to the world‟s population.

The drive for this study was the increase in the number of patients available for hysterosalpingography, HSG investigation. The aim of the study was to determine the radiation risks to the patients and staff during HSG procedure.

A cross sectional study was conducted on 38 female patients in two diagnostic facilities in Katsina state of Nigeria.”

It is important to know that the staff performing the procedure stays in the radiographic room together with the patient while the x-ray exposures take place, this should not be confused with the operator of the x-ray machine”.

Quality control tests were conducted on the x-ray machines involved in the study as preliminary tests to ascertain the credibility of the generated data.

The entrance surface doses ESDs to the patients‟ pelvis and anterior neck surface of the staff were measured by placing TLDs on the patients‟ pelvic surface and the shirt collar of the staff respectively. The mean measured patient ESD and staff ESD were 10.88mGy and 0.12mGy.

The patients‟ mean measured effective doses to the ovaries, uterus, bladder, rectum, pelvic bone surface and the pelvic skin surface were 0.87mSv, 1.31mSv, 0.44mSv, 1.31mSv, 0.11mSv and 0.11mSv.

While, the staff mean measured effective doses to thyroid, eyes and facial skin were 4.8µSv, 14.4µSv and 1.2µSv.

The total exposed films used were between 4 to 6 films, this implies that the patients‟ ESD per film is 1.8 to 2.8mGy which is below the IAEA diagnostic reference level of 10mGy for Antero-posterior (AP) projection pelvis.

And the mean radiation dose received by the staff is below the recommended occupational dose of a radiation worker by international commission on radiological protection ICRP 103.

Though the mean measured effective dose values obtained were low, it does not indicate zero health effect since in radiation protection there is no safe dose for now. It should be understood in principle that dose acquisition has cumulative effect.

Introduction

1.1 Background of the Study

X-ray is a form of electromagnetic radiation which was discovered on November 8, 1895 by Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen. This ground breaking discovery gave birth to radiography on December 27, 1895; when Roentgen took the first x-ray image of his wife‟s hand (Explorable.com, 2010).

This made scientists at that time use this amazing ray to create images of the inside of the human body. But it was not for long when people started complaining of skin burns and cancer.

In the late 1896, Elihu Thomson, an American physicist, deliberately exposed the little finger of his left hand to an x-ray tube for several days, half an hour per day which resulted in pain, swelling, stiffness, erythema and blistering.

In 1942, the leaders of the Manhattan District of U.S. asked Ernest O. Wollan, a cosmic ray physicist at the University of Chicago, to form a group to study and control radiation hazards and this was when the word „health physics‟ was born.

However, because of the various complaints that arose as a result of the uses of x-rays, various bodies (both governmental and non-governmental) were created to provide solutions and recommendations on how to reduce the adverse effects of radiation (Kathren & Ziemer, 1980; Turner, 2007). 

The use of ionizing radiation in clinical practice is on the increase both locally (in Nigeria) and globally.

Certain checks have to be periodically done in order to ensure the optimization and protection of patients from these dangerous rays; in addition to investigate compliance level,

Survey data showed that physicians underestimate the magnitude of radiation doses and their associated detrimental effects and thus underestimating the level of risk to patients (Mercuri et al., 2011).  

How to Download this Project Material

First, note that we are one of the best and most reliable online platforms because we don’t retain any of your personal information or data as regards making payments online.

PRICE: ₦3,500 ₦3,000  (Three Thousand Naira Only)

Make a bank deposit or mobile transfer of ₦2,000 only to the account given below;


Bank Name: UBA Account Number: 1022564031 Account Name: TMLT PRO SERVICES


After making the payment, CLICK HERE to send the following on WhatsApp;

  • Depositor’s Name or Screenshot of Payment
  • Name of the Past Question
  • Active Email Address

or Call Us On +2348082284439 Once your details have been received and your payment confirmed by us, you will receive the past question in your email or WhatsApp within 5 Minutes.

Guarantee of Getting the Material 

We understand that due to the high rate of fraud, many people are afraid of making purchases online but be rest assured that PastExamQuestions will deliver your material after payment.

Once your details have been received and your payment confirmed by us, you will receive the past question in your email or WhatsApp.

Give us Feedback

Have we been able to satisfy you? How well do you think the material will be helpful after having gone through it? Does the price worth the material?

Let’s hear from you! We recommend that our customers give feedback at the end of every transaction to enable us to serve better. You can do this by clicking the review button on this page.

Where is the review button? >> Just scroll up to where you see reviews

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “Assessment of Radiation Risk to Patient and Staff During Hysterosalpingography (Hsg) Using Conventional X-ray in Katsina State, Nigeria”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *